I think it's more likely they recorded the video when the project was already done than cheated

Yeah, I agree that's the most likely explanation. My point is that these demo hiccups should not show up in your announcement, it casts doubt on the product for no good reason. It's sloppy.

Moonshot has already teased K3.1 so not likely

K3.1 would likely be a deeper/longer post-train from K3, so that’d make sense.

It’s all marketing anyways, but that’s at least how a lot of labs have been naming things (sometimes).

Why?

Build?

Nah these robots are for repacing the customer service jobs

Alibaba is entirely capitalistic I'm afraid

People often use this a argument against small phones like this wouldn't be amazing for any company outside apple or Samsung

If small phones were a widely popular thing then there would be a company making them successfully or it would’ve been greater than 5% of iPhone sales. An individual company with zero brand power or presence wouldn’t have any decent sales. This is not even considering that the value proposition would be way worse than just buying a slightly bigger and significantly better phone with more R&D put behind it.

The reality is 90% or more of people don’t care about that or even think about it, this sentiment only exists in online tech enthusiast spaces. If you’re in HN you’re as non-representative of the average consumer as one can get.

5% of iPhone sales is an enormous amount of revenue. Billions right?

Bring back OS licensing, Apple!

What if you don't own a phone?

Another site in fact https://dontasktoask.com/

The intermediate tickers are fake but real data comes in and resets it. Its like a progress bar essentially. We don't call progress and bars fake

I do when their fake like this site is. Insane people blindly believe this stuff

I don't really remember a situation, which of those models supposedly beat the other?

I still opus 4.6 though not for code