I've been using the last Deepseek Flash update for a week and I'm amazed. It was a capable model for easy tasks but now it looks like it can do some heavy development for peanuts.
IME I can't trust it to write it's own plans from a spec, but if I give it a detailed execution plan written by Opus, it's fast and cheap (if chatty) in executing it.
There aren’t many “far stronger” models than Flash 0731 now, it’s only beaten by Claude and OpenAI models at high/max effort, and everything that matches it costs 5x-10x more.
Depending on the language you're writing in and the problem domain, the smaller models can do dramatically better or worse.
I suspect in the future we'll see language-specific small models. "Coding" is still pretty broad as an activity. It'd be nice to be able to load up a model specific to, say, class-based Python and run it on-device.
I find DeepSeek flash incredible for the price and good in general if it has good plans. I will typically plan using Opus or GLM, then implement with DSF
I'm working on a browser IDLE game made with Go. I've never touched Go before. The game core it's 80% done and it was pretty easy to code but I have no idea what I'm doing in with the transport/http layer.
At this rate I'll have it finished by the end of the next decade.
That's awesome! I 100%ed melvor idle and a bunch of the other big ones like antimatter dimensions, cookie clicker etc. Is there some way to get informed when you release it?
I've been using DeepSeek Pro for a while and Flash only for certain dumb tasks where I only need the speed of a LLM and not big brains.
I find the newest OpenAI and Anthropic models to be way better for big tasks that require many decisions but I don't like that anyway because I lose track of what's being done.
Knowing what I want for every prompt makes DeepSeek Pro the best LLM for me. It allows me to work relatively fast at a very low price.
reply