There’s a surprising amount of variety in between implementations of “OpenAI” endpoints.

You can test it now on the official deepseek api. Just set your model to deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910

It’s good and very fast.

(Note that the deepseek API trains on your data)

Nah it’s fine. They committed to international devices being unlocked, and the firmware lock is trivial to bypass anyway.

I can believe a lot of people said that. But I'm not sure that means it's a true prediction of consumer behavior.

Easy, Rambo. How about we start with any punishment.

Because he posted about it.

It was an incredibly racist post claiming “gypsies” are like invading wolves and that something more drastic must be done to get rid of them before they kill all the “sheep” in Copenhagen.

It's actually a standard term for the person who plays this role during incident response https://www.pagerduty.com/resources/incident-management-resp...

Hours after they alerted Meta that similar activity was happening from their corporate network?

Read to the end. It isn't really clear how much causality can be inferred from the hours after thing.

Hey if the dad is into tech, decent chance the angry teenage kid is into tech too.

And probably back doors, too. Gotta verify in the downloads though.

Well the porn titles leans it a little.

I get what you're saying and it's concerning how much power these big labs have amassed and how little transparency there is in what they do with it...

But I doubt this a major factor in the trend. I just don't think it's something most corporate users run into. My understanding is these guardrails are negotiable for enterprise customers anyway.

And, not for nothing, but if I owned a human-powered translation company I would've refused to translate it too.

Why? Seems like benchmarks that closely mirror the tasks you'd want an LLM to help with would be a lot more useful than some general intelligence benchmark.