Aibro gets a glimpse at class consciousness for half a second before admitting they are part of the problem and then carrying on.

As an open source - community driven project? Have you looked at the repo on github?

Theres thousands of PRs from claude agents or whatever.

Yeah really feels like a worthwhile place to contribute lol.

> As an open source - community driven project? Have you looked at the repo on github?

FOSS as in FOSS - Free and Open Source Software. Has nothing to do with if it's community driven or not, I'm strictly talking about FOSS.

Lol your country and your capitalism helped build China.

Wasn't that the thing like ~30 years ago? All the western companies pushing manufacturing into China for increased profit?

Capitalism and the west gave all that power away :), you deindustrialised yourselves.

An llm doesnt 'prefer' to use anything.

Whats different to the effects system just being a type system?

Isnt a function that opens a particular file still just a type? Perhaps dependent?

Reminds me of mercury which has determinism of the function like type signatures.

You're right, an LLM doesn't have preferences. As shorthand, I thought it a useful concept though, as they do have particular ways of writing that can be tuned for.

The effect system here is part of a type system (technically a type-and-effect system). Where a value type typically describes what value a computation returns, an effect describes which operations it can perform during evaluation.

The difference is that effects propagate through the call graph, so lower-level code cannot access disallowed resources without that authority appearing higher up. At runtime, world effects also require an explicit grant. In a typical value type system, lower-level code can introduce side effects without them appearing in the caller’s type.

Children are more vulnerable and more easily influenced, and so are easily swept up by a new technology being rolled out non-consensually society wide, much like social media ~20 years ago.

You mean the Overton window or whatever has drifted right.

Nationalism is a right wing concept.

elixir/erlang gets compiled into beam byte code. It's a vm. why does this matter..

It's an interpreted byte code run (interpreted) by BEAM. Not a native binary run by CPU.

But apparently BeamAsm JIT solves the issue? As mentioned in the sibling comment.

But why does a particular execution model matter?

Raw performance.

A theory is something you can test, model, write proofs, do calculations, eg quantum field theory, group theory.

Simulation "theory" isnt a theory its a conjecture.

Theres no meat to it.

I wonder if all the commits which involve adding tons more test are the basis for a rewrite in rust anthropic marketing event

Probably better to not simply reduce it by just saying X is Y then if it has all that extra complexity and capacity.