Interesting thanks. I always find code review (even of my own code) pretty difficult, and I think in this LLM coding era, I've been avoiding it as much as possible. Maybe if I lean in to it, it'll close the pleasure gap between vibe coding and "normal" or "merely AI-assisted" coding and I'll be able to get a handle on it
I think you're right that it's not that really "work" related. What's stopping me is that I don't want to give up the chance of another little "hit" from it. I suppose that mechanism is a big part of why I enjoy coding in the first place, which might explain why it's difficult to disentangle what I like about my job from the addictive nature of vibe coding.
yes i think the writing itself already speaks "claude brain" — not criticism, personally, learning with/from machines to write well-structured and clear instructions has been quite helpful.
Interesting points, thank you. To explore your idea: what if I was addicted to using C++? I don't mind using the new, high-level tool all day (be it Claude Code or C++), but it's continuing to vibe code with it for several hours AFTER the workday is OVER that is bad. To your point, I guess when one learns a more powerful programming language, there is an initial period of enthusiasm and then it might wear off and become more mundane. Maybe I just haven't reached that with Claude Code yet. It feels like Claude Code has kept improving quickly, which may have kept this workaholic binge cycle going for longer than usual. Regarding the non-code decision stuff - yes, it's definitely related. I have always been someone who researches, seeks reassurance, and wants expertise and rules to apply to my decisions, instead of making them from the gut. I suppose this "Ask HN" post is an example of that, in a way - I'm crowdsourcing solutions to a personal problem. But it feels different (and better) to seek opinions from human beings - even though they will be represented to me as text, just like "opinion-like" strings of words from Claude... when I was younger I would describe myself as addicted to online forums. So I guess the artificiality of the intelligence isn't the problem. It's just the speed and always-on connectedness - similar to the internet itself.
I'm also a Numbers fan. I actually like using Pages too. When I use Microsoft Office, I remember its power but I also find it relatively difficult to use.
Pages greatly confused me the first time I tried to use it, several years ago. That's because it included a bunch of templates for different kinds of documents, and when you created a new document from one of those templates the document was full of text and images.
That text was Lorem ipsum [1]. I had never seen that before and assumed that I had somehow gotten the templates for some other language installed with my English Pages install.
I then spent a few hours trying to figure out how to change template language settings or install English templates.
I eventually copies some of the text and Googled it, hoping to find someone else who had this problem and had found the fix and then learned about Lorem ipsum.
Nowadays when you create a document from the templates that come with Pages the placeholder text is in your language and is usage instructions for the template.
