This approach is interesting, probably near that SDD, but also expensive in time and tokens.
And it can lead, to my experience, to an other problem is looping between agents, that work without never finish on a scope by always identifying something, with often side effects that generate new problems.
Elon Musk said that (without him ;)) world demography gone a decline, as it is in Japan or Italy.
If radical right political parties arrive in Europe for exemple, are women gone a make children again?
Or are we going to massively clone ourselves to conquer other planets?
Or finally let humanity slowing disappear letting robots replacing them definitively ?
Maybe, I want to ask the LLM to work as a specific procegure, but the long Promt may lead the fault, if I can invite a "workflow" to confirm the LLM will work in proper manner that if they do somethings wrong the Harness can feedback and stop to execute the tool calls, there are much less mistakes.Perhaps...
Yes perhaps in this case you should watch the video of Garry Than about Personal AGI.
He give a really interesting approach about creating your own context each days.
David Gurlé, founder of Antimatter, has an impressive track record of taking on industry giants with unconventional approaches in telecommunications.
He’s now taking a similarly contrarian approach to AI, betting on the decline of Anthropic and other proprietary AI players.
In a recent French-language interview with Carlos Diaz on Silicon Carne, he explains his vision for rethinking both AI infrastructure and energy consumption through mobile micro data centers.
Because it need to be handled by the agent's owner themselves or a third party. Difficult to a protocol to guaranty that.
reply