Probably, but does not mean a state organized it. So if there was free transportation just for this day just for that route -> strong indicator of Morocco involved.
So, I a remain curious to the base of the claim, but so far it rather seems rumors.
The upthread HN claim was that this "was an attack".
The Xitter claim was that:
Moroccan traffic police keeps directing thousands of illegal migrants toward the Spanish border fence in Ceuta.
This is a state-orchestrated invasion of Spain.
The video shows a small number of people on a small number of truck beds calmly going about a roundabout.
No visible attack, no proof that the people visible are "thousands of illegal migrants" nor of where they are or where they are headed.
Are you claiming this video shows free trains for immigrants?
It shows people on cars and police waiving them on like all the other traffic. So possible they especially were set up for the immigrants, but no idea how one can conclude that from this short clip.
I never understood how people referred to or understood “whataboutsim”.
I personally understand it not as a diversion but as a critique of the moral higher ground implied by the first accusation. Said differently: keep your own house in order.
Hilarious. It is absolutely a logical défense: our societal order and its relative fairness don’t emerge from the void.
Otherwise a victim defending himself is the same as the person assaulting?
Perpetrator: you just stabbed me OMG!
Victim: you were going to rape and kill me
Perpetrator: sorry that’s just whataboutism and definitely not a logical defence. Your actions can be judged on their own merits, regardless of who presents the arguments.
Nope, defense is an action to prevent an attack. China isn’t building coal plants to stop global warming.
Also, the world isn’t two sides. There are tons of participants on this site who are not in the US that criticize both china and the US (i.e. most of Europe). So you realize how stupid the defense looks of “I’m behaving like a piece of shit because this guy behaves like a piece of shit” when there is a room full of people trying to do the right thing.
If your argument is whataboutism, it means you have no actual defense for your behavior. You’re just appealing to “someone else did something bad”.
When open online spaces gain popularity, the threat of devolving into a cesspool of bigotry and misinformation rears its head. Sadly, moderation isn't optional.
But how do you moderate? Do you establish your own ministry of truth? Only allow contributors with a university email address (shoutout to the arXiv)?
Wikipedia decided to externalize part of the vetting process by placing formal restrictions on the sources you're allowed to collect information from.
Sadly, there currently aren't any such sources for Odin.
reply