Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | snypher's commentslogin

>cell of actors

Oh, a group of people? Your mind is already decided with the language you have used.


Not having handles where they should be at 1000 callout should have been an instant toga party.

That they passed their minimums and still weren't set up correctly is shocking, yes. How can you commit to landing instead of going around when you're not configured for landing?

The more egregious thing to me though is ignoring the GPWS callouts on approach because they were chasing the glideslope. If you can't maintain a stable approach, you need to go around, it's the first thing you learn.

You expect this behaviour from a first-timer in the sim, not a commercial cargo pilot.


> You expect this behaviour from a first-timer in the sim, not a commercial cargo pilot.

I'm curious - are commercial pilots reprimanded for doing a go-round after messing up the approach?


No. They might have to say why they went around but they can't be punished for it (that's a great way to open yourself up to liability even stripping away all of the human elements). And I can't imagine any reason that an airline would truly care since they don't want their planes crashing so they don't want to discourage pilots from going around if they need to do so. The delay incurred is usually fairly small anyways, maybe 20-30 minutes.

However I will say that the majority of unstable approaches (97%!!) do continue to landing: https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Go-aroun...

...but I think that most of these unstable approaches are likely marginally unstable and only in one dimension. This landing was so far outside the realm of normal it's actually mind boggling that it actually happened. Pilots are trained to immediately go around without questioning it if many of the things that happened on this flight occur (such as not being in landing configuration well before touching down!)


No, they're reprimanded for continuing.

https://skybrary.aero/tutorials/stabilised-approach


Probably didn't happen. Here's some material detailing that day; https://www.dawn.com/news/amp/589198

How does this actually work though?

1) I see a photo online and doubt it's provenance

2) I contact the photographer and ask to see their cloud image (???!)

2a) I borrow someone's mac to download the image (.jpg?) and it can be verified on that?


Ideally it’d be linked to public key on a DNS txt record or similar, and trustworthy clients (including social media apps) show the domain linked to the photo.

Autel dragonfish and hanger and you're halfway there. Will need a fat checkbook (the bird is ~$200k) and be outside of the US.

Everyone wants a winner on the day, and if the votes are pushed back it goes into 'hanging chad' time, which some appointed judge can just decide if the votes are included / the winner.

I'd wager most of us are OK with it taking a few days. There's a (relative) few weirdos that get upset if they see the numbers change as votes continue to be tallied.

They could just drive it into someone.

>hazardous gas detection, search and rescue, as well as suspicious package investigations

What the fuck does that have to do with immigration and customs enforcement?


At least I could walk right up to JD Power and shake His hand.

>You cannot surrender your legal obligations to an autonomous system

Ha ha. What is the legal system but autonomous, for those without the money to access it fairly?


From this article it seems like the author got his start in tiktok advertising, so this blog, or wellness site or whatever is probably just more of the same.

https://hackernoon.com/i-watched-tiktok-for-hours-then-accid...

His newest work is literally AI powered blogs

https://blogbott.com/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: