This is “gallery documenting the Hallucinate project (a MMO rave)”, and not “gallery made by AI hallucinating for two weeks” (as I originally assumed).

I guess this could be implemented externally.

Eg via some app that instructs respondents to enter a specific answer in a pseudorandomly chosen question.

Of course security would be another question.

Which toys exactly were taken? The repo seems open source, is any component missing?

In response to sibling: > It's still open source because you can fork it if you really want

Yes, that's exactly what it means!

Cursor has access to the latest models so it should be equivalent, right?

Or is there some other AI usage described in this article that is not supported by cursor?

I don't use Cursor so I mentioned it as slightly impartial suggestion but my point is broader. I hear and have seen results from others using Composer 2.5 which is only available in Cursor.

The article’s title seems needlessly dramatic, the article itself doesn’t reference the LLM’s danger.

The title could have been just “Shepherd’s Dog: A game by Fable 5”.

Not sure if it would've gone to the front page of Hackernews with that title! I was also trying to make a little fun about the drama around Mythos/Fable: Even though Fable did this really well, to me it does not appear to be fundamentally different from other top models.

Yeah, fundamentally the same: Worthless.

funny how a worthless LLM belongs to the fastest revenue growing company in the history of Capitalism

Because others are paying for it. It’s a lot easier to get revenue when you don’t have to care about CAC or paying the bills.

google it. this article from one month ago is already obsolete, annualized revenue grew from 30 bln to 44 bln in the last month

https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-it-hit-a-3...

Bit of a funny thing to so proudly assert in your millionth "your favorite show is shit" type comment, don't you agree?

In close lockstep with @ai_fry_your_brain, who at least makes it clear right on the tin that they're not here to engage in any earnest capacity whatsoever. Always a mixed feeling between being appreciative of that, and finding it blatant.

Good thing it's AI ruining communities, a thought I have no doubt you also share in. If only people properly recognized the hard work of people like you in this.

> intereting

Typo, “interesting”; “interneting” also works.

> Rust Rewritten PostgreSQL

https://fablepool.com/projects/53

there's someone already doing this: https://github.com/malisper/pgrust

I guess the new LLM implementation will just ~copy~ clean room reimplement that then.

It also contains all possible falsehoods and comes with no way to distinguish what's true from what isn't.

But enough about LLMs

For the company, yes. But not for the manager - who now has insanely actionable stuff.