> I’ve learned a lot also from Clojure because, at the time I was thinking about Elixir, Clojure was already around. I like to say it’s one of the top three influences in Elixir
[...]
> The main, the top three influences are Erlang, Ruby, and Clojure.
[...]
> I was like, no, but I’m going to call them protocols because there are a lot of similarities between Clojure and Elixir in terms of them being dynamic languages and in terms of the macro system. I was like, okay, I’m going to call them protocols because the closest thing we have today to what I want is Clojure
And he goes on talking about more inspiration and similarities from Clojure like Agents, etc.
Edit: Ah I see where you could have gotten confused. By "version of Clojure" I meant in that it is very similar and has taken a lot of inspiration from it. Elixir isn't an actual dialect of Clojure the way that ClojureScript and Clojerl are. That's not what I meant to imply. Having used both language, they do share a lot of similarity in design, with most of the differences being Beam/Erlang vs Jvm/Java, and Elixir pulling more from Ruby, while Clojure pulls more from Lisp. This is what I meant by "a version", I should have said "is like Clojure, but..." instead I think to avoid this confusion, but too late for me to edit now.
> I’ve learned a lot also from Clojure because, at the time I was thinking about Elixir, Clojure was already around. I like to say it’s one of the top three influences in Elixir
[...]
> The main, the top three influences are Erlang, Ruby, and Clojure.
[...]
> I was like, no, but I’m going to call them protocols because there are a lot of similarities between Clojure and Elixir in terms of them being dynamic languages and in terms of the macro system. I was like, okay, I’m going to call them protocols because the closest thing we have today to what I want is Clojure
And he goes on talking about more inspiration and similarities from Clojure like Agents, etc.
Full exert is here: http://blog.cognitect.com/cognicast/120
Edit: Ah I see where you could have gotten confused. By "version of Clojure" I meant in that it is very similar and has taken a lot of inspiration from it. Elixir isn't an actual dialect of Clojure the way that ClojureScript and Clojerl are. That's not what I meant to imply. Having used both language, they do share a lot of similarity in design, with most of the differences being Beam/Erlang vs Jvm/Java, and Elixir pulling more from Ruby, while Clojure pulls more from Lisp. This is what I meant by "a version", I should have said "is like Clojure, but..." instead I think to avoid this confusion, but too late for me to edit now.