Seems win-win to simply use chromeframe. Given this is a web app which presumably customers are already invested in using (since they're paying for it), requiring a 60s one-time install seems like the best course of action for everyone involved.
Slow speed of execution in IE might well be considered a vast improvement compared to the current state of affairs
Unfortunately the general public doesn't think like that. To the average Joe your site is slow therefore it sucks.
Slow speed of execution in IE might well be considered a vast improvement compared to the current state of affairs
Unfortunately the general public doesn't think like that. To the average Joe your site is slow therefore it sucks.