Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ouch :)

My point is largely that Lobster has a much more defined and recognizable look than classic "Sans" fonts like Arial and Helvetica and "Serif" fonts like Times and Georgia.

The look is recognizable enough that it evokes comparison to other sites, which you may want to consider. It can also break down the fourth wall between your site and it's viewers if they recognize the font. They go "oh, that's lobster, one of google's free fonts" instead of "nice logo" which, again might not be what you're after.



Professional designers can spot Gotham instantly, and will make fun of you for using it in a logotype. The relevance of that to a web app developer is zero.


Why is Gotham a bad choice for logotypes?


It's not.


Ok, why would professional designers make fun of someone for using Gotham in a logo type?


Because it is very widely used.


That's a ridiculous reason to make fun of someone for!




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: