Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> So for those people, the LLM is replacing having nothing, not a therapist.

Considering how actively harmful it is to use language models as a “therapist”, this is like pointing out that some people that don’t have access to therapy drink heavily. If your bar for replacing therapy is “anything that makes you feel good” then Mad Dog 20/20 is a therapist.



An extremely large accusation - do you have any evidence to suggest this is as harmful as you say?


It’s not really that contentious of a statement. Language models encouraging delusions is pretty well-documented.

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spi...

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psych-unseen/202507/...

And we’re in a comment thread about a study that concluded:

>LLMs 1) express stigma toward those with mental health conditions and 2) respond inappropriately to certain common (and critical) conditions in naturalistic therapy settings

And it’s been shown to be addictive

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intell...

So if you overheard somebody say “I don’t do that stuff because it’s addictive and people go crazy on it” you would probably assume that they were talking about a substance. Or at the very least you would not assume that they were talking about seeing a therapist.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: