Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>That's assuming he's actively malicious.

No, it's not. It's not assuming that he is against the PATRIOT Act. I've seen no reason to believe that he is, other than the projections of his constituency. President Obama has advanced and legalized most of the encroachments on civil liberties from the Bush years, and in no way that I am aware of has he made any argument to curtail them since he was Candidate Obama.

Assigning malice to that is assuming that he believes that the PATRIOT Act is a bad thing, and that supporting it would be knowingly perpetuating a bad thing. In other words, assuming that he secretly thinks of PATRIOT as you think of PATRIOT.



Obama never claimed to be against the PATRIOT Act. He claimed he would work to reform it. However, Presidents don't write legislation and reform has never made it into any bills reauthorizing the Act. That said, the president has directed the Justice Department to enact certain oversight above and beyond what is required by law.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/pr...


"Reform" is one of those lovely words that means precisely whatever the audience thinks it ought to mean.


It happens the same with "change" and many others.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: