> It shows that you can build a crazy popular & successful product while violating all the traditional rules about “good” code.
It shows that given enough hype and fomo you can convince many people to do this tool to build various types of things while the quality of this code suffers.
It's the opposite of how non-vibecoding companies and individuals are using LLMs to improve the quality of the code.
It shows that given enough hype and fomo you can convince many people to do this tool to build various types of things while the quality of this code suffers.
It's the opposite of how non-vibecoding companies and individuals are using LLMs to improve the quality of the code.