Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


Are Israeli concerns the axis around which the world must revolve? In any case they can keep busy ethnically cleansing south Lebanon and murdering Palestinian children.


Do you think only the Israelis are pissed about the Iranians funding the Houthis and Hezbollah?

The Saudis were at war with the Houthis for several years, Hezbollah assassinate Lebanese politicians and repeatedly starts wars that nobody else in Lebanon wants, which also includes intervening in the Syrian civil war on behalf of Assad and starving out Syrian villages. Ask the Syrians how they feel about Hezbollah.


The fact that none of these were considered critical discussion points tells you just how desperate the US/Israel coalition is for a ceasefire.

It really does feel like the rescue op was a failed raid on Isfahan, and this is the Plan B.


No, what I think it really tells you is that these just Iran's proposal. So far as I know, the US (and Israel) have not actually agreed to these.

I've seen several posts here saying that they have, but what I haven't seen is any evidence or links. Until I do, I reserve the right to believe that the US has not actually agreed to Iran's plan.

But my (grandparent) post was off. If these are Iran's proposed points, of course they're going to say that Israel stops attacking Hezbullah but that Iran is free to keep arming them.


It’s amazing to me to see the amount of people willfully ignorant in this war, and having extremely short memory.

In June we had the 12th day war with Iran, it also ended with a ceasefire which continued to negotiations which collapsed and here we are.

Now, a ceasefire again, and people already claiming that Iran has won and trump accepted their demands.

I’ve seen people saying at first that Iran didnt agree to the ceasefire and then saying that they won’t open the strait. Completely oblivious people.


It's not oblivious. It's more willfully ignorant. Even that is not right. Most people are just so anti-America and anti-West that they side with actual despots and choose to believe strange things. If we send 10,000 bombs to Iran and lose an F-16E and have to search for a pilot for a few days, these people believe this means Iran has won the war. If China puts a balloon on our coast, these people believe China has defeated us militarily. I responded to a post the other day where someone was claiming Cuba could "easily" neutralize the entire U.S. Navy with a handful of drones or something.


> If we send 10,000 bombs to Iran and lose an F-16E and have to search for a pilot for a few days, these people believe this means Iran has won the war.

Is your objective just sending 10k bombs to Iran?

If your objective is death, then yeah, the US won. Enjoy the all that death, because seemingly it's all it got from the war. Double points for the exploded schoolgirls, perhaps?

It would confirm that the US is truly a vile country. Not to anyone's surprise, really.


If they would read the actual news the ceasefire is contingent on immediate opening of the strait. That’s the deal, open the strait and the bombing stops while we negotiate over the next two weeks.


I don't think this ceasefire is going to last as long as people think. It just gives a chance for everyone to bury the dead, resupply, rearm and continue the war.


By that logic, the US and Israel should have never offered a ceasefire and stuck to the regime change narrative. Accepting a ceasefire shows that America was never serious about controlling the Strait, and passes the initiative back to the Iran/China axis instead of straining it through a joint blockade. The tactics make zero sense, considering the objectives laid out at the start.

It's been weeks of war, America should have something to show for it. Right now, Iran has successfully used America's offer as a way to muzzle Israel in Lebanon and muster their own strength with Russia and China. Even from a Zionist perspective, this is a terrible result.


How does Iran's proposal, which neither the US nor Israel have accepted, muzzle Israel in Lebanon?

But I will agree that the tactics make zero sense.


It passes Iran the initiative. Since the beginning of this war the onus has been on America and Israel to apply pressure and make Iran sue for peace. In terms of controlling the ground, the mass and structure of Iran's forces are nearly the same as when they started. There was no assistance from the Kurds, there was no coordinated multilateral assault with America's allies, nothing happened. Iran can regenerate their proxies and seek assistance while stringing America and Israel along on a proposal they won't sign.

From a strategic perspective America needs to deprive Iran of their allies. If they are serious about fighting this war, a line has to be drawn with Russia and China that prevents them from providing world-class reconnaissance. China particularly has to be economically sanctioned for their assistance, but the US Navy let them sail their tankers right through the Strait without a single PLAN vessel nearby. Opening the strait weakens Russia's (already battered) share of oil exports while rewarding China for supporting Iran and condemning the US. It's stupid.

From where I'm standing, last week would have been a great time for a Shock and Awe campaign to finish this off and make it a tidy weekend war for the folks back home. But we saw none of that, instead America is ostensibly cutting it's losses and (reportedly!!!) entertaining the same 10-point plan that concedes Iran's nuclear program and missile program to them.


Why would the US be desperate for a ceasefire?


Upcoming midterm elections and lack of public support for the war.


Lack of domestic support, lack of international support

the requirement for congressional approval if the conflict persists longer than 90 days from the first “military operation”

potential for escalation by various allies into a much more involved conflict

downstream impacts of Hormuz being impassable

among I’m sure several other reasons I’m not informed enough to point out.


One preference the US public seems to reliably deliver via elections is the desire for lower prices.


Because it's becoming another Middle East quagmire which the American public has very little patience for, and it's bad for Wall Street, bad for prices at the pump, and bad for the global economy.


Do you understand how escalation works? US policymakers have discussed this for literal decades at this point, I'm shocked that we have to reiterate this.

Neither America nor Israel are willing to put boots on the ground. The bombing campaign failed, the naval campaign did not secure the Strait of Hormuz, and the enriched nuclear material is not going anywhere. If the war continues to escalate, America and Israel will be directly blamed for the humanitarian consequences of desalinization, ammonia and nitrogen plants being attacked. They cannot alleviate these issues with a air war, so they have to sue for peace or commit to a real invasion. Thus, the escalation ladder entirely belongs to Iran, they decide what the US and Israel coalition bleed for.

It's why the US threatened civilian infrastructure; they ran out of leverage. The stated goals were not attained, the home front in Iran is not divided, the China/Russia support axis is not disrupted, and America's allies won't fight alongside them for Israel. It's over, this is the damage control phase for both sides.


All those ships are needed for an easy win in Cuba.


[flagged]


[flagged]


> Iran funding terrorism across Europe

Provide strong evidence or retract your statement.



1) In Germany, a man was arrested recently over a suspicion of belonging to Hamas and planning attacks. A suspicion. Belonging to Hamas.

2) Alleged by the authorities to have been done by Hezbollah.

3) Not Europe.

4) Not Europe, and it's been merely alleged by PM Albanese that the incident had anything to do with Iran.

> I can add more if that’s not “terroristy” enough for you.

Please do, as the ones above are really not meeting the bar.


Two of these are outside of Europe.


Great job in being pedantic and missing the point.


It is not pedantic. You said that Iran funded terrorism “across Europe”. When asked for sources, half of what you provided was not relevant to the statement. I surmise you are arguing in bad faith.


So if I said instead that they fund terrorism across the world you believe me?


Every state involved here is a sponsor of terrorism. If we had a real global liberal order all of their leaders would be in the Hague . There's only one directly doing genocide with expansionist ambitions, so I'm going to root against that one.


lol at directly, meanwhile the houthis literally have “Death to America Death to Israel Curse on the Jews” written on their flag. You sure can pick the good guys.


The indirect perpetrator I was implying was the US. Saying "death to America/Israel" isn't doing a genocide, even if the words really really hurt your feelings.


So resistance against genocide is bad but the genocide is fine? There are clear good and bad guys here.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Burgas_bus_bombing

Good ol genocidal Bulgaria I guess huh?


Strongly disagree with the attack of course but it claims the bus was full of Israelis so it's quite targeted and not against Bulgaria.


so the good guys attack Bulgaria because Israel?


The bus supposedly only had Israelis. Israel attacked a neutral country Qatar with a missile to eliminate some supposed enemy agent to a civilian building, so I don't think they have any problems with this.


Why would Iran agree to any of this?


So they don't get destroyed




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: