I agree entirely! I see a lot of 'steampunk' thinks like this pop up on the MAKE Magazine blog (and similar) and have always found it somewhat onanistic, despite the face-value beauty of some of the pieces.

In the end, I feel that form should follow function. Making something like this look like it should be functioning in ways that it never will perhaps just serves to outline its mundanity.

(Ooh err, I've probably gone and thought about it too much again.)

I feel much worse about it when car companies or furniture makers try to make one material look like another. Faux wood, faux leather, ect. I consider the steam punk aesthetic to be purely ornamental. That the ornaments may appear at first glance to have some practical purpose doesn't detract from the overall aesthetic for me.

I agree, and this is actually the problem I have with most steampunk sculpture.

Your reaction makes sense to me. I did cringe a little bit when I read that he took some of the parts from watches that were over 100 years old.

It still looked pretty cool, though. I'm curious to see what else could be done along these lines. The laptop patio11 posted looks incredible.

He probably meant "I had some watch parts almost 100 years old", not like a perfectly cared-for and functioning watch was dismantled for a USB stick.

It still looks better than most USB sticks out there, regardless of function.

No, it's not just you. Mrs Browl and I felt similar disappointment...as she said, he only had to get one wheel to move and then connect others. Which would still have been aesthetic rather than functional, but would have served the function of showing you it was alive.

Perhaps in version #4.

I felt the same way. Quick antidote here: http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/6278166_YCdn5

I agree. I think this cat and mouse armor is much more pleasing: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=649020