Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We really do not need a page of snarky asshole comments about the gay agenda.


Exactly. Can we have a discussion about Chris Beard and Mozilla rather than a repeat of an argument about Brendan Eich?


Apparently not, and it seems that question was settled long ago. I'd say every "side" of this story definitely agrees that Brendan, and the reasons he was removed from the position, are VERY relevant to who can and will hold the position of CEO at Mozilla.

So, while it's a bit sad, I don't think there can be discussion of Mozilla's CEO for some time into the future without the related discussion of Brendan Eich.


So when one agrees with something, everyone else should just move along, like nothing happened?


a) snarky one liners don't contribute to the conversation, especially when several other people have already said the same thing. b) framing lgbt rights as an agenda cooked up by "the elite" is laughable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: